QUOTE(ThornTON @ Dec 11 2010, 09:17 PM)

I can agree with that, but can we afford him at the expense of Young. I'd say we need Young more, although would rather have Fitzharris in there than the half the jokers in the team!
To me, anyone who values Young's value to the club over Fitzharris is missing the point regarding our failings. We are in dire need of a creative spark, with pace who can produce something for the strikers.
If our strikers aren't the greatest, it is an absolute must to get them good service - poor strikers will score goals from good service whereas even the best strikers in this division will struggle to score if they get no service at all (note 'in this division' - any striker who can consistently create chances for himself will be playing at a higher level than the first division).
Young's job - if playing along side Tidser - is to break up play and win the ball back. Not saying he's not good at it, or even potentially the best at the club at it, but that job could be done by somebody else... Jenkins, Bachirou, etc.
If it was a straight choice between the two I'd 100% keep Fitzharris.