IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> S.n.p.s 6 Month Policy, Letting the neds off
ton5saints1
post Mar 6 2009, 04:27 PM
Post #1


GMFC Supporter
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 762
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Shawlands Glesga
Member No.: 436



Bloody disgraceful that the S.N.P. have announced their plans to scrap prison for those sentenced to 6 months or less.

Loads of wee neds up and down the country must be killing themselves laughing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lazy_ar*e_studen...
post Mar 6 2009, 05:02 PM
Post #2


GMFC Supporter
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined: 23-July 05
From: £9.99
Member No.: 417



This has been mooted by the SNP for a few years now. What we have seen is McCaskill talking about change for Community Sentencing making it appear to be more effecticve to the Scottish public than Prison, getting away from the "bed and board" mentality. Whilst I can see certain circumstances when CS is more appropriate than Prison (i.e. fine defaulters) and can understand their reasons, to have a carte blanch 6 months can be dangerous and likely to be (a) unpopular and (cool.gif unlikely to happen.

This post has been edited by lazy_ar*e_student: Mar 6 2009, 05:02 PM


--------------------
WHEREVER IT TAKES US- WHATEVER IT TAKES
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alibi
post Mar 6 2009, 05:04 PM
Post #3


Sir Alastair
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,979
Joined: 15-July 05
From: Dumfries
Member No.: 232



Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too?

The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place.

This post has been edited by Alibi: Mar 6 2009, 05:05 PM


--------------------
"What do you do when democracy fails you?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom_McB
post Mar 6 2009, 05:21 PM
Post #4


GMFC Supporter
*****

Group: Fun Patrol
Posts: 5,826
Joined: 28-July 05
From: Newton Mearns (South of Weegieland)
Member No.: 458



QUOTE(Alibi @ Mar 6 2009, 05:04 PM) *
The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place.


Reducing the punishment is unlikely to change that.



--------------------
It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. The Wealth of Nations, Book I Chapter II

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences."

The goal of Socialism is Communism- Lenin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David Edwards
post Mar 6 2009, 05:30 PM
Post #5


GMSC Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,955
Joined: 18-July 05
From: Wits End
Member No.: 349



QUOTE(Alibi @ Mar 6 2009, 05:04 PM) *
Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too?

The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place.


They must be unionists. laugh.gif


--------------------
no mo do yakomo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ton5saints1
post Mar 6 2009, 05:37 PM
Post #6


GMFC Supporter
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 762
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Shawlands Glesga
Member No.: 436



QUOTE(Alibi @ Mar 6 2009, 05:04 PM) *
Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too?

No - length of time doesn't come into it whether your sentenced to 7 days or 7 years.
Many fairly serious crimes, possession of knives being one, can carry 3/6 month sentences and it's disgraceful that the S.N.P. heirachy think that can be replaced by community service.

The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place.


Totally agree.

Unfortunately the policy has been designed because prisons are at breaking point and has absolutely nothing to do with rehabilitation or whatever else it's meant to achieve.

It might even spur me on to join my local S.N.P. group as it's a disgraceful policy to let hundreds of wee neds off the hook.

Bring back the birch !!!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lazy_ar*e_studen...
post Mar 8 2009, 09:56 PM
Post #7


GMFC Supporter
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined: 23-July 05
From: £9.99
Member No.: 417



As I said T5S1, if you read any of the documents round Community Sentencing whilst they don't say in blatant terms what you said it is pretty obvious what they're looking at, increasing the use of CS to reduce the numbers of prisoners- I think in South Ayrshire they had a pilot of not sending fine defaulters to Prison but instead issuing a Supervised Attendence Order, as a result ppl paid their fines!


--------------------
WHEREVER IT TAKES US- WHATEVER IT TAKES
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th September 2010 - 03:58 AM