Welcome Guest ( Log In )
![]() ![]() |
Mar 6 2009, 04:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
GMFC Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 762 Joined: 26-July 05 From: Shawlands Glesga Member No.: 436 |
Bloody disgraceful that the S.N.P. have announced their plans to scrap prison for those sentenced to 6 months or less.
Loads of wee neds up and down the country must be killing themselves laughing. |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:02 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() GMFC Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,839 Joined: 23-July 05 From: £9.99 Member No.: 417 |
This has been mooted by the SNP for a few years now. What we have seen is McCaskill talking about change for Community Sentencing making it appear to be more effecticve to the Scottish public than Prison, getting away from the "bed and board" mentality. Whilst I can see certain circumstances when CS is more appropriate than Prison (i.e. fine defaulters) and can understand their reasons, to have a carte blanch 6 months can be dangerous and likely to be (a) unpopular and (
This post has been edited by lazy_ar*e_student: Mar 6 2009, 05:02 PM -------------------- WHEREVER IT TAKES US- WHATEVER IT TAKES
|
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:04 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Sir Alastair ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,979 Joined: 15-July 05 From: Dumfries Member No.: 232 |
Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too?
The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place. This post has been edited by Alibi: Mar 6 2009, 05:05 PM -------------------- "What do you do when democracy fails you?"
|
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:21 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() GMFC Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Fun Patrol Posts: 5,826 Joined: 28-July 05 From: Newton Mearns (South of Weegieland) Member No.: 458 |
The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place. Reducing the punishment is unlikely to change that. -------------------- It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. The Wealth of Nations, Book I Chapter II
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences." The goal of Socialism is Communism- Lenin |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:30 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
GMSC Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,955 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Wits End Member No.: 349 |
Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too? The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place. They must be unionists. -------------------- no mo do yakomo
|
|
|
|
Mar 6 2009, 05:37 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
GMFC Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 762 Joined: 26-July 05 From: Shawlands Glesga Member No.: 436 |
Is it not the case though that the offenders who really need to be inside will be getting sentences greater than 6 months anyway? I would assume that for assault or stabbing etc a short sentence wouldn't be considered appropriate. I can see the point of not imprisoning people for minor offences, but surely they must take into consideration the nature of the offence too? No - length of time doesn't come into it whether your sentenced to 7 days or 7 years. Many fairly serious crimes, possession of knives being one, can carry 3/6 month sentences and it's disgraceful that the S.N.P. heirachy think that can be replaced by community service. The real problem here is too many people breaking the law in the first place. Totally agree. Unfortunately the policy has been designed because prisons are at breaking point and has absolutely nothing to do with rehabilitation or whatever else it's meant to achieve. It might even spur me on to join my local S.N.P. group as it's a disgraceful policy to let hundreds of wee neds off the hook. Bring back the birch !!! |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2009, 09:56 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() GMFC Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,839 Joined: 23-July 05 From: £9.99 Member No.: 417 |
As I said T5S1, if you read any of the documents round Community Sentencing whilst they don't say in blatant terms what you said it is pretty obvious what they're looking at, increasing the use of CS to reduce the numbers of prisoners- I think in South Ayrshire they had a pilot of not sending fine defaulters to Prison but instead issuing a Supervised Attendence Order, as a result ppl paid their fines!
-------------------- WHEREVER IT TAKES US- WHATEVER IT TAKES
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th September 2010 - 03:58 AM |