Have replied on that several times. Not wasting my time doing it again for those that can't read properly.. (I was being patronising after I'd heard he was a bit of 'poor soul' - there summed up quickly!)
Not remotely my style to physically threaten someone... or wish injury upon someone. That's for low-lifes.. and hypocrites. Ok, not writing another word in response to you.. you're not worth my time.
Actually, no you haven't. The exact post was as follows;
so all those times you were going on about how you had everyone wrapped around your finger, and how much you enjoyed the reaction of the people with "issues", where do those fit into this clarification?
I like how the cruciate ligament count is worse than Hitler but your own veiled threat is now retconned as patronizing. You wrote three posts - which you shat out of and deleted - talking about the "background" you have. This, it now transpires, includes knowledge that the person you were addressing would run a mile from trouble in real life. The picture that emerges from this is not flattering for you.
You "took action" based on what other people were saying even though you were enjoying the psychological manipulation of those with issues? Are you aware of how massively confusing this is?
You're a crybully, you tried trolling and failed miserably when the blowback came back far harder than you anticipated, and now you're trying to seize the moral high ground since your campaign of manipulation has failed.
To whoever your friend is, by the way, I'll be at the Albion Rovers game in July, and while I'm not interested in "trouble" (on account of not being a perma-seething mess) I'll happily tell him to his face that you're a ****ing plum who's brought all of this on himself.
You're yet to address this point. In the interests of fairness, and all parties being treated equally, why on earth should I, or anyone for that matter, just take your word for it that "it's not your style to physically threaten someone" when you won't give me the courtesy of laughing off my remark, but have instead chosen to play the victim, cry foul and garner sympathy off cretins like EdDeBawbag and cornbeef?
What was that we were saying about hypocrisy?
You don't know if it's my "style" to physically threaten someone- you've openly admitted you don't know me. Yet, you're happy to go along with it when it suits your agenda and expect everyone else to just accept your despicable behaviour as mere banter as you're not that sort of guy. Doesn't wash I'm afraid.
Of course, like the many other times you've told me you'll not be responding to me, I'll just have to be disappointed. Were you not a man of your word (
), I'd expect the next meltdown to be as glorious as the rest have been. VikingTON had better clear out his inbox.